Samsung Galaxy Nexus banned in US

Apple's claims that movable copies iPhone technology upheld by US court and follows ban on sales of Samsung Tab














An yank decide has banned the sale of Samsung's new Galaxy Nexus movable within the us when Apple claimed it copied a number of the technology employed in its iPhone.

A decide had previously banned the sale of Samsung's pill pc. each bans can continue till the matter is taken into account in court.

Apple and Samsung, the world's 2 largest client electronics companies, are waging war through the courts of many countries, accusing one another of patent violations as they vie for supremacy within the mobile market.

The decision on Friday by decide Lucy Koh in San Jose, California, comes days when she placed a pre-trial ban on sales of Samsung's Galaxy Tab ten.1, a pill pc that runs on Google's Android and competes with the iPad.

Apple has waged a world patent war since 2010 to limit the expansion of Google's Android system, the world's most-used mobile operating platform.

Opponents of Apple say it's using patents too aggressively during a bid to stamp out competition.

Apple spokeswoman Kristin Huguet accused Samsung of copying the design and feel of its product. Samsung wasn't immediately obtainable for comment.

As a condition of the injunction, Apple was ordered to post a bond of quite $95m (£60m), to hide damages sustained by Samsung ought to the injunction be later deemed a wrongful call.

Read More »

9:17 AM | 1 comments

Man convicted over website offering links to TV and video content

A man has been convicted on conspiracy charges concerning his operation of surfthechannel.com, a web site giving links to TV and video content.

Newcastle crown court heard Anton Vickerman's website had up to four hundred,000 users daily and created concerning £35,000 a month in revenue. whereas UK prosecutors didn't pursue a case on copyright offences, Vickerman was found guilty of conspiracy to defraud and faces sentencing next month.

The conviction will increase pressure to halt plans to extradite Sheffield student Richard O'Dwyer to the US on copyright charges concerning a way smaller web site. At its peak, O'Dwyer's website reached concerning three hundred,000 users a month and was estimated by prosecutors to possess taken approximately £147,000 in revenue over around 3 years.

Supporters of O'Dwyer argue that if he's to face trial it ought to be within the UK instead of the US.

Wikipedia's founder, Jimmy Wales, launched a modification.org petition against the O'Dwyer extradition try within the Guardian on Monday, that at the time of writing had over eighty seven,000 signatories.

Among them were 2 members of the Commons culture, media and sport choose committee – its Labour deputy chairman, Tom Watson, and Conservative MP Louise Mensch.

Politicians of all parties have raised the O'Dwyer case, as well as home affairs committee chair Keith Vaz, former Liberal Democrat leader Menzies Campbell, Lib Dem president Tim Farron, Conservative MPs David Davis and Dominic Raab, and inexperienced MP Caroline Lucas.

Also among the signatories of Wales's petition was Graham Linehan, author of the sitcoms The IT Crowd, Black Books and Father Ted, who said the prosecution itself – not simply the potential extradition – was a cause for alarm.

"It simply looks to me that folks like Richard are being punished for having the ability to navigate the fashionable world," said Linehan. "The web has modified everything, they are doing what comes naturally in these new, uncharted waters and suddenly they are obtaining their collars felt by those that still have Hotmail addresses.

"And then [there's] the sheer surprising arbitrary nature of it all … to be told that you simply might face up to ten years for sharing links? once I heard that Nora Ephron died, I shared on Twitter a link to the total version of When Harry Met Sally on YouTube. Am I a criminal now? Why? Why not?

"The web means commerce and communication and culture and morality is changing, and changing thus quick that we have a tendency to struggle to stay up."

The Federation Against Copyright Theft (FACT), a trade organisation of rights house owners, was a driving force behind the prosecution of Vickerman, passing a dossier of proof to police, who then arrested him in 2008. The body welcomed his conviction.

"These are landmark criminal convictions proving that those operating pirate websites don't seem to be outside the law however may be tracked down and dropped at justice," said truth director general Kieron Sharp.

"This was a criminal conspiracy for criminal profit to fund a criminal lifestyle and Vickerman is currently paying the worth."

Others, however, raised issues concerning the character of the conviction against Vickerman and therefore the involvement of business teams in getting it.

"This wasn't a case brought using copyright law. The interest teams concerned could not gift a case of copyright infringement and instead determined to press for the utilization of the common law offence of 'conspiracy to defraud'," said UK Pirate party leader Loz Kaye. "This is one amongst the foremost controversial crimes in English law – it criminalises conduct by 2 or a lot of those who wouldn't be criminal when performed by a private.

"The offence was notoriously utilized in the Nineteen Seventies to stop folks sharing film cassettes because the TV and film business believed video was a threat to their existence.

"In addition to flying within the face of recent findings in similar cases, this prosecution was driven by non-public interests. it's acknowledge that the terribly teams representing the victim helped with the investigation, were gift at the arrest, given access to the proof and were gift at police interviews. this can be deeply regarding."

In another UK case Alan Ellis, who ran a web site directory of BitTorrent links, was cleared of conspiracy to defraud in 2010 because the court deemed he couldn't be held accountable if his users used his platform to share links to copyrighted material. during a similar manner, Google isn't typically held to be liable for the contents of its links.

Read More »

5:15 AM | 0 comments

Windows licence issues and activating Windows 7

 Mike has a failing PC and thinks he needs to replace his hard drive, but is worried about re-registering Windows 7
 
 














 The notorious blue screen of death that nobody wants to see.

 My laptop has suddenly become terribly unreliable. I frequently get a "blue screen of death" and therefore the laptop reboots. Most of my user accounts have disappeared, leaving me with only 1 account that has kid protection turned on, creating some applications inaccessible and blocking access to the user accounts section within the management panel. Chkdsk typically runs on boot up, and infrequently reports lost files. i think that the onerous disk is failing and that i wish to switch it, however i'm worried that can|i will be able to|i'll} have to be compelled to re-register my 64-bit Windows seven licence which Microsoft will see this as illegal, duplicate use of the licence. What would you advise?
Mike A

It's fairly uncommon to urge a "blue screen of death" (BSOD) or, correctly, a Stop Screen on Microsoft Windows seven, however the screen ought to offer some indication of what went wrong. Blue screen issues are often onerous to resolve as a result of there are such a large amount of doable causes. the foremost common ones are bugs in video graphics drivers, and faulty hardware, like memory chips that aren't properly seated or have gone dangerous. However, each viruses and anti-virus programs will cause BSODs, therefore it is important to see for rootkits using GMER and to run a decent checker like Malwarebytes Anti-Malware (MBAM). you'll be able to save the free version to your desktop and run a fast Scan.

Microsoft encompasses a trouble-shooting guide, Resolving stop (blue screen) errors in Windows seven, that might assist you isolate the particular drawback.

In this case, it sounds like you either have a very dangerous virus infestation, with multiple varieties of malware, or the onerous drive very is failing, and wishes to get replaced. to visualize if it's the latter, run the free diagnostic utility, HDD Scan. this may assess the health of your onerous drive.

Today, Windows seven machines generally go together with a hidden "restore partition" that may come back the laptop to its factory condition. I expect that the laptop manufacturer additionally prompted you from time to time to form restore discs on DVD or on an external onerous drive, therefore I hope you probably did that. If the onerous drive is decaying, this may now not be doable.

If your machine is from an oversized laptop company, then your copy of Windows seven is provided, installed, activated and supported by that manufacturer, and not by Microsoft. Indeed, Microsoft has no data of, and no record of, what you have got got – custom drivers, additional utilities, crapware etc.

With this type of low cost deal, the copy of Windows is "locked" to the hardware on that it's shipped and isn't transferrable or refundable. this can be referred to as an o.e.m SLP (Original Equipment Manufacturer System Locked Pre-installation). It works like the activation is tied to the BIOS chip on the motherboard, and this could literally be the case.

The versions of Windows provided by laptop makers do enable for a "clean installation" to an empty drive, however you'll need to check the support web site for precise directions. Unless you have got a disk image of your PC's state before the issues, a clean installation is maybe your best bet.

In sum, you should not have any issues reinstalling Windows seven employing a DVD provided by the manufacturer or made of the restore partition, using the merchandise Key on the Windows COA (Certificate Of Authenticity) sticker on the bottom or the rear of a laptop or typically within a laptop's battery compartment. These re-installations don't typically have to be compelled to be activated, and will be automatically validated after you install Windows Updates. If you do not have a Windows disc or backup, then you'll be able to still reinstall Windows seven from an ISO download, using your Product Key, however you'll need to visit the laptop manufacturer's web site for drivers and utilities.

Of course, if you modify the motherboard, even to a uniform motherboard, then you must expect to re-activate and revalidate Windows. However, in my expertise, changing onerous drives, upgrading graphics cards and adding memory at infrequent intervals doesn't.

Note: not all Windows licences work within the same manner. Microsoft looks to require a tougher line with OEM System Builder licences (the type you'll be able to purchase cheaply if you build your own PC), and with Upgrade versions. Even Windows Anytime Upgrades – that are fast "in place" upgrades to your current Windows seven or Vista laptop – need Microsoft activation. However, Microsoft looks to require a somewhat laxer read of full retail packages, that you're additionally allowed to transfer from one laptop to a different, as long as you delete the previous installation. (I've bought full retail copies of each XP and Windows seven, and you wish one in every of these to run Windows on a Mac.)

You can continually install Windows seven and run it for up to thirty days while not a key. Finally, if the more severe involves the worst, you'll be able to continually activate Windows seven by phone. a technique to try to to this can be to click begin and sort "slui.exe 4" (without the quote marks) into the Search box, then press Enter. this could enable you to pick out your country and find directions at no cost activation.

Read More »

3:44 AM | 0 comments

Samsung ordered to halt US sales of Galaxy tablet

Court considers Apple's claim that South Korean tech giant illegally copied the iPad design for its Galaxy 10.1 computer

















Samsung's Galaxy 10.1 tablet computer: the judge said Apple would be irreparably harmed if sales continued. Photograph: Jo Yong-Hak/Reuters

A decide has ordered Samsung to halt sales of its Galaxy ten.1 pill pc within the US whereas the court considers Apple's claim the South Korean tech big illegally copied the look of the iPad.

California district decide Lucy Koh said on Tuesday that Apple's lawsuit appeared probably to prevail. "Apple has established a powerful case on the deserves," she said.

Koh had said earlier the 2 product were "virtually indistinguishable", however in December she determined against prohibiting sales of the Galaxy ten.1.

She modified her mind when the US court of appeals for the federal circuit told Koh to rethink Apple's request for an injunction, ruling on nineteen June that it appeared the Cupertino-based company had a powerful case. The Washington court handles most patent appeals.

"Although Samsung includes a right to compete, it doesn't have a right to compete unfairly, by flooding the market with infringing product," Koh wrote in her order on Tuesday. She said Apple would be "irreparably harmed" if sales of the Galaxy ten.1 continued.

Samsung said it absolutely was disappointed with the court's call. during a statement, the corporate said: "We can take necessary legal steps and don't expect the ruling to possess a major impact on our business operations, as we have a tendency to possess a various vary of Galaxy Tab product."

Koh ordered Apple to post a $2.6m (£1.67m) bond in case it loses the case.

The ruling is a component of a way larger patent battle between the 2 tech giants. The trial is scheduled to require place next month in San Jose, California.

Apple filed its lawsuit last year and also the 2 corporations are locked in patent disputes round the globe over smartphones and handheld computers. Samsung, with its Android-powered product, has emerged jointly of Apple's chief rivals.

Apple conjointly accuses the South Korean company of infringing patents associated with the iPhone. Apple is seeking an analogous injunction barring Samsung from selling one in all its smartphones within the US.

Read More »

8:46 AM | 0 comments